Tag: syndicated

  • Advice I Like: Failure

    If it fails where you thought it would fail that is not a failure. – from Excellent Advice for Living

    This is a great quote, especially for those of us working in computer systems. We often design things like HA (which I wrote about this past week), circuit breakers, and other techniques to handle problems we know about.

    When those things occur, we’ve planned for them, so I get that these are not a failure. In fact, they are a known case we’ve designed for.

    The same thing for me, if I am building something on the ranch. If I put in a post and don’t cement it, and then need to add a wheel to a gate (ask me how I know this), then if the gate leans over, it’s expected.

    On the other hand, if the piece of metal holding the wheel on fails, that’s a failure. I expected it would keep the wheel on, but apparently, it isn’t engineered well enough to handle a load from a slight slope. Sad smile

    I’ve been posting New Words on Fridays from a book I was reading, however, a friend thought they were a little depressing. They should be as they are obscure sorrows. I like them because they make me think.

    To counter-balance those, I’m adding in thoughts on advice, mostly from Kevin Kelley’s book. You can read all these posts under the advice tag.

  • SQL Server 2025 RegEx and AI

    One of the language changes in SQL Server 2025 that I’ve seen a lot of people mention is the addition of RegEx functions to T-SQL. I decided to take a few minutes and try to examine how this feature works, and how I might use it. And more importantly, can AI help?

    This is part of a series of experiments with AI systems.

    Data with a Bit of a Pattern

    One of the common things people use Regex for is validating email addresses.

    I created a basic table in a database that looks like this:

    CREATE TABLE customer
    (
         customerid INT NOT NULL
             CONSTRAINT CustomerPK PRIMARY KEY,
         customeremail VARCHAR(200),
         validated TINYINT
    )
    GO

    I then asked PromptAI to get me some test data like this:

    2025-11_line0142

    I wasn’t connected to a database, but I still got code generated with insert statements. The AI also noted I had a “validated” column, and it populated that appropriately: 1 for good email, 0 for bad ones.

    2025-11_line0143 

    Once I run the inserts, I have data.

    2025-11_line0145

    Now, can I check that the AI did this correctly?

    REGEXP_LIKE

    In SQL Server 2025, there are a number of regular expression functions, and REGEXP_LIKE is one of these. This function is designed to return a boolean if the string_expression matches the pattern_expression, where the latter is the regular expression.

    2025-11_line0146

    Prompt sees this as a valid function for SQL Server 2025, which is great. I want to use the customeremail from the table as my string to check. For the regex, I need to create a regular expression, something I am not good at doing. I learned to do this at a very rudimentary level when writing Perl, but I’ve lost whatever little skill I used to have.

    I saw an expression on StackOverflow for validating email. Let’s check if an AI can help.

    2025-11_line0149

    In a few seconds, even on airport wi-fi (SFO as I write this), I get a response.

    2025-11_line0150

    This looks like the expression from the SO answer, though much shorter. If you read SO, you know that the format isn’t as set and stable as we’d like. In any case, let’s see what this shows.

    This is interesting. I get an error.

    2025-11_line0152

    If I look at the docs, this says it returns a true/false, which I’d assume would convert to a 1/0, but let’s try an explicit case. When I do this, it works.

    2025-11_line0153

    I can also do this in the WHERE clause, where the true/false thing just works. Let me move the function to the WHERE clause. If I do that, I have this code:

    SELECT customerid,
            customeremail,
            validated
    FROM dbo.customer
    WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(customeremail, '^[A-Za-z0-9._%-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$')

    When I run this, I see what I expect:

    2025-11_0136

    Not a bad enhancement to the T-SQL language.

    Summary

    There’s a lot written on RegEx, so this post isn’t intended to delve deeply into what RegEx expressions you choose. Rather, I wanted to show the basics of this REGEXP_LIKE() function, and showcase one of the weird things I found when including this in the column list. I also haven’t looked at performance yet, though that certainly is something to be concerned about with larger datasets

    There are other changes in SQL Server 2025, and I’ll try to examine some in the coming weeks.

  • T-SQL Tuesday #192: SQL Server 2025 Backup Changes


    I hosted this month, but I decided to put my own entry in as well. There are more things in this release than I expected, probably because of the overwhelming focus on Fabric from Microsoft that has drowned out other changes.

    I’ve been a DBA (or Ops manager) for quite a bit of my career, and one of the things I’ve thought was top priority was backups. I always want to be sure I have a recovery strategy, because if I don’t, nothing matters. Things go wrong and systems fail and I need to protect systems.

    Security is a close second, but backups really matter.

    I was excited to see that full and differential backups can be set on secondary replicas in AGs. To be fair, I had assumed this would be working by SQL Server 2022, but I hadn’t checked. Glad it’s been added. I know, I know, I questioned if you need HA, but that’s more a staffing question than one of whether HA makes sense in general.

    Backups, especially on larger systems, can be a load on the server. We’ve seen this with compressed backups natively, or with something like SQL Backup. As a result, offloading this to another system is something I’d want to do.

    Of course, there’s still the challenge of making sure you get these all organized in one place (don’t have the 1 copy of your diff only on one secondary), but that’s a separate post.

  • Monday Monitor Tips: ServiceNow Integration

    Earlier this year I visited a customer that was using the Redgate Monitor webhook to integrate with ServiceNow. However, they were also trying to integrate in a richer way to create incidents and a richer experience.

    We took that as a bit of feedback and recently released native ServiceNow integration to allow updates to incidents as status changes. Automatically.

    This is part of a series of posts on Redgate Monitor. Click to see the other posts.

    New Native Integration

    Redgate Monitor originally only integrated natively with PagerDuty. Over time, we’ve add other ways to connect to other systems and send alerts or data to them. Slack and webhooks were available first , but recently we’ve changed.

    If you click the gear icon in the upper right of Redgate Monitor, you’ll go to the configuration screen.

    2025-10_line0097

    In here, look for the Notification settings. This likely as an “Improved” tag if you look at it in late 2025. Click this.

    2025-10_line0098

    On the Notifications settings page, you see email settings at the top. Most customers configure this as email is still a great way to capture alerts and handle routing of info to a team.

    2025-10_line0099

    If you scroll down then you see the other types of notifications. Slack has been there for some time, and if you click this, you see the details you can configure.

    2025-10_line0100

    The new alert sinks are ServiceNow and Microsoft Teams. If I click the ServiceNow item, I see some details. I can enter my ServiceNow URL and the API key to connect. I can optionally also close an incident if the Alert ends. That’s always helpful.

    2025-10_line0101

    Microsoft Teams is similar. Here I’m just sending messages, as I do in Slack. I can enter the URL, which would be for the location I want messages sent. I can optionally send a message when the Alert ends.

    2025-10_line0102

    We still have the Webhook settings as well, so you can send to your orgs messaging system (Slack/Teams) and another location with a Webhook if you want. This might be useful for a different system or perhaps a dashboard where you are tracking information about databases.

    2025-10_line0103

    Redgate Monitor has grown to add these new options to give you the flexibility you need to handle alerting staff about database issues.

    Summary

    Managing a large estate is hard, and it is incredibly helpful to have tools to organize, track, and share information. Redgate Monitor is a great platform for this, and with these new integrations, it can be used alongside existing tools to prevent you from missing any of those important alerts.

    Redgate Monitor is a world class monitoring solution for your database estate. Download a trial today and see how it can help you manage your estate more efficiently.