Author: way0utwest

  • Republish: What Keeps You Employed?

    I’m traveling this week to various customer sites. This is a hectic week, with trips to Norfolk (VA), Nashville, and St Louis. Three customers in three days. This is  a rough week, with meetings during the day, flying in the late afternoon/evening to a new city, and a repeat again.

    As a result, you get What Keeps You Employed? to reread.

  • Modifying a Trigger to Capture More Info: #SQLNewBlogger

    I had someone ask me about using triggers to detect changes in their tables. This is a second post looking at triggers, in this case, modifying my trigger to detect more changes and using that information.

    Another post for me that is simple and hopefully serves as an example for people trying to get blogging as #SQLNewBloggers.

    The Setup

    We’re using the same table from the last post.  This is the dbo.Customer table with a PK and 5 other fields.

    In this case we want to track the changes to an email and capture what those changes are. In other words, if I update the email from ‘sjones@sqlservercentral.com’ to ‘steve.jones@red-gate.com’, I want to capture

    To do this, let’s modify our trigger. We can still test if the field is updated with UPDATE(). We did this in the last post.

    This will let us know that the column changes by returning a boolean. If this is true, we want to insert the new values into our logger. We also want to capture the old value. These values are stored in the inserted and deleted tables, which are available in a trigger. I’ll use a join between these on the PK to get the same data from both.

    I’m also using a query with these tables because more than one row can be updated and we want to capture all the changes.

    Here is my new trigger, with the OR ALTER added to the code.

    CREATE OR ALTER TRIGGER Customer_tru ON dbo.Customer FOR UPDATE
    AS
    BEGIN
         IF UPDATE(CustomerName)
             INSERT dbo.logger (logdate, logmsg) VALUES (DEFAULT, 'dbo.Customer.CustomerName changed')
         IF UPDATE(AddressKey)
             INSERT dbo.logger (logdate, logmsg) VALUES (DEFAULT, 'dbo.Customer.AddressKey changed')
         IF UPDATE(CustomerStatus)
             INSERT dbo.logger (logdate, logmsg) VALUES (DEFAULT, 'dbo.Customer.CustomerStatus changed')
         IF UPDATE(CustomerContact)
             INSERT dbo.logger (logdate, logmsg) VALUES (DEFAULT, 'dbo.Customer.CustomerContact changed')
         IF UPDATE(ContactEmail)
         BEGIN
             INSERT dbo.logger (logdate, logmsg) 
             SELECT GETDATE(), 'ContactEmail updated from ' + d.ContactEmail + ' to ' + i.ContactEmail 
              FROM inserted i
              INNER JOIN Deleted d ON i.CustomerID = d.CustomerID
         END
    END

    This is mostly the same code, but now I’ve changed the last conditional test. If the email is updated, I want to query the inserted and deleted tables and create a log message. This is the type of thing I’ve seen often in systems, and while it’s not a great pattern, it does let me capture some information. There are some problems with this, I’ll discuss in the next post.

    We can see below that when I run this code, I get the updated captured and logged.

    2025-05_0230

    This post has introduced a few new things, the inserted and deleted tables, which I didn’t discuss in the last post. However, they are useful when you want to capture information affected in triggers, which can be more than one row. Using these tables helps you set up triggers that handle multiple changes.

    There are problems with this trigger, mainly with NULLs, potential performance, and architecture in what is captured, but we’ll address those in the future.

    SQL New Blogger

    This post looks at enhancing a previous post and providing more information. You (hopefully) learn from your work, from both feedback  and experiments, and you should modify your thinking and work. This shows how I’ve adapted something I did previously, which is a skill we all need.

    This was a 20-30 minute post for me. You could likely do it in a similar amount of time.

  • T-SQL Tuesday #187–Solving Problems

    This month we have a great invite from Joe Fleming, a first time host of T-SQL Tuesday. Joe reached out when I requested some hosts and I’m glad he did. He’s got a great challenge for people and I’ll answer in two ways, for work and non-work.

    I manage the T-SQL Tuesday site and I’m always looking for hosts, so if you want to host one month from your blog, send me a note on Twitter, Blue Sky, or at SQL Server Central.

    Troubleshooting SQL Server

    In my career, I’ve had all sorts of issues come up. Here’s a description of one of the stranger issues. This isn’t the exact issue, but it was similar to this.

    A user reported they couldn’t log into the server. They were logged on earlier, but can’t connect now through an application. What could be the problem?

    When looking at this type of issue, I usually think there is some sort of network issue here, or perhaps a service issue. My  thoughts are:

    • Can I connect? Or can others? (trying to determine if it’s this user)
    • Can this user connect with another app that might give an error message?
    • Is the server instance up? (check the basics and isolate if this is networking)
    • Has this login had a change to permissions/password/etc. Perhaps an AD change.
    • Has something else changed on the server?
    • Has something changed on this user’s machine?

    At some point, I’ll isolate where the issue is and determine how to fix it. In this case, I managed to determine the user was a DBA that was playing with a logon trigger and locked themselves out.

    The UTV Won’t Move

    On the ranch we have to learn to handle lots of things ourselves. YouTube has been a boon, but it’s also a bit of common sense and problem solving that we need to get things done. It can be hard to get people out to the ranch, especially for small things.

    Sometimes big things.

    Awhile back I came back home from a trip to find the spare UTV we have in one of the fields. I asked what had happened and a kid said that it died.

    That’s not a good description, so I asked how it died. What was going on? what was happening? This kid said they’d stopped the vehicle to do something and put it park. When they went to shift into drive, it wouldn’t move.

    Did the engine run?

    Yes, but the UTV didn’t move.

    Now that I had a better story, I could debug further. I knew that it ran and went out to start it myself. Sure enough, it starts and the shifter didn’t do anything, but it felt loose.

    Sometimes hands-on helps. I knew immediately a cable had broken.

    First thing, get this out of the field. I knew there was a way to shift it without the cable, I just had to figure out. (YouTube to the rescue). Once I did that, it’s research to figure out how hard this is to replace and where I can get the part.

    I logically move through the steps of how can I practically get things done.

    From here, I saw someone talk about this on YT and show me this isn’t hard. I learned how to shift into Drive with a pair of vice grips, got it up to the house, and I found the part online. I ordered it, send the YT link to the kids, and tasked them with fixing the cable.

    They did, after some problem solving from me.

  • Shorten the Debate

    Many of us are faced with choices and decisions constantly in our jobs. How do we approach a problem? What should we do as a team to get the work done? How do we code or manage or test or do something else with a database?

    Maybe more importantly, how long do we spend deciding?

    I have seen teams spend way too long (in my opinion) debating options and examining possibilities. I’ve seen them take days or weeks arguing and considering edge cases and move slowly. It seems there is no shortage of reasons why something isn’t done. It can drive me a little crazy.

    I was listening to a podcast recently and heard about this technique, which I love.

    Get a whiteboard that everyone can see (physical or virtual). One person is designated to write down all the discussion items about the issue. Each person can make an argument for or against an idea for the solution, and nobody can stop that argument from being added. However, nobody can remove anybody else’s argument, and nobody can repeat an argument that is on the board.

    This can shorten discussions because people can’t repeat things. I’ve seen far too many debates (arguments) continue in a circle because people keep repeating things or circling back. When no one has anything new, we just take a vote and move on.

    I am a big fan of getting things done. Even if we don’t have the best, or optimum, or more efficient solution, we need to get moving. Perfect is the enemy of good enough, and far too often, I find technical people chasing perfection, or near perfection, at the expense of moving forward.

    Timebox decisions and get moving. It’s how you accomplish more, and it’s what your employer wants.

    Steve Jones

    Listen to the podcast at Libsyn, Spotify, or iTunes.

    Note, podcasts are only available for a limited time online.