Author: way0utwest

  • Serverless Gets Faster

    When the Azure SQL Database serverless option was introduced, I was a bit disappointed that I couldn’t get the database to pause any sooner than 1 hour. That meant I needed to ensure clients didn’t access the system for an hour, but also, that I burned an hour of compute after the last access.

    Recently I saw an announcement that this time frame has come down to 15 minutes. While this might seem like a very simple change from a technical standpoint (just alter a timer option), I’m sure there was more work needed. I’m also sure there was a lot of debate on the sales/marketing side to decide if this would lose a lot of revenue.

    I’m sure this costs Azure some compute revenue in the short term, but it might also create opportunities from customers who consider using this in new situations since it can shut down quickly. I certainly think this makes the use of an Azure SQL database for QA/staging type work more attractive. This might also get more people to take a look at serverless and realize the auto-scale benefits are pretty cool.

    My request would be to drop this down to 5 minutes and increase the range of auto-scale as well. Maybe allow me to go from 2-16 vCores if needed with corresponding memory jumps. I don’t know I need this by the minute, but I would like to have things shut down fairly quickly if we stop a workload and aren’t using the system.

    I’d also like a better retry on startup other than trapping an error on the client and re-sending my request to connect. It’s just embarrassing that we still have that happening for a cloud PaaS service.

    Steve Jones

  • Everything is Code

    I posted a note on Twitter/X with this quote: “The content updates had not previously been treated as code because they were strictly configuration information.” This is from testimony given by Crowdstrike to a US Congressional committee in trying to explain how they grounded much of the airline industry a few months ago. That was a mess of a situation, and apparently, the vendor didn’t think their configuration was part of their code.

    That’s an amazing viewpoint to me. The fact that any developer or manager thinks that their configuration data isn’t a part of their code is worth testing. Yet, I see this attitude all the time, where developers, QA, managers, and more think that the code is the only thing that changes or doesn’t change, ignoring the fact that there are configuration items that affect the code and need to be managed appropriately. Certainly, if the config data were in enums rather than in a file or database they’d feel differently.

    I think part of the reason that people try to ignore config data is that it is hard to manage. Often config data might change between dev, test, and prod. Dealing with that, and testing appropriately is hard. I haven’t ever seen a good solution for getting data into an environment the first time. That’s the hard part. Once the data is there, you can use it as a token where it is needed, and hopefully, the value has already been tested. At the very least, you can test how that data affects that environment.

    I am glad to see Crowdstrike publicly recognize that they need to dogfood not only their code changes but also their config changes. However, for a company that hasn’t shown a rigorous engineering approach, I suspect they’ll test very simple and basic config changes and not necessarily do a good job of carefully testing a variety of potential problem vectors. That takes work, and excluding config data from testing is a sign (to me) of a technology group trying to avoid doing too much work. It’s likely more management and leadership than technology workers, but the entire organization is showing signs of shortcutting good engineering.

    My view is that developers should be free to experiment and try lots of things, and have a lot of freedom on how they build software. I think the same thing for infrastructure people as well. However, as we start to move our changes towards production, everything should be in code, version-controlled, and promoted through PRs. In other words, get everything stored as code and nothing gets changed outside of development. It only gets approved to move forward or rejected, after it’s well tested.

    That’s a tough process to implement, and one many companies don’t spend the time doing, but for those that do, they end up deploying many  fewer bugs.

    Steve Jones

    Listen to the podcast at Libsyn, Spotify, or iTunes.

    Note, podcasts are only available for a limited time online.

  • A New Word: Opia

    opia – n. the ambiguous intensity of eye contact

    The entry for this says “so much can be said in a glance, “ which I think is very true. Most of the time eye contact is amazing. I think we can express a connection, a welcoming vibe, a neighborly willingness to talk.

    I try to smile and make eye contact often in my travels. I feel this creates a more pleasant view of the world, and it often gets others to smile or at least grin. The same reason I wave to people often. They wave back.

    I also wave to dogs and horses, though they don’t smile or wave back.

    I think eye contact is mostly good, but I know it can be creepy. Certainly too many men stare at women, and there are those that project ill-will or bad intentions. I think we can sometimes wonder about an intense eye contact and the meaning behind it.

    Casual eye contact, however, is something I think helps create bonds between us.

    From the Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows

  • Friday Flyway Tips: Searching a Migration

    This was actually a cool tip I saw internally from one of the product managers, when trying to find specific text in a migration.

    I’ve been working with Flyway Desktop for work more and more as we transition from older SSMS plugins to the standalone tool. This series looks at some tips I’ve gotten along the way.

    A Large Project

    I’ve got a project in Flyway Desktop that I add to regularly. It doesn’t do anything amazing, but I keep slowly adding objects, with the idea that I want to build up a large project for showcasing different things to customers. You can look at the project here if you are interested.

    In my list of migrations, I’ve got a number of migrations, 21 to this point. It is a little hard to read names here, but I’ve named each script to make searching easier. I’ve included a create or alter, a type, and an object name. This helps me use the search box at the top of FWD, which searches migration names.

    2024-10_0002

    Most of these are relatively small scripts, one or two objects. A few are a little larger. If I select a particular one (21 as shown below), the code scrolls off the screen. Even if I expand the code listing to take up the entire screen, I can’t see all the code.

    More importantly, it can be hard to visually find something in the code. If you’ve ever edited a stored procedure of 100 or more lines, you know what I mean.

    2024-10_0003

    One of our PMs pointed out recently that you can use the standard browser CTRL+F if you’ve clicked into the script. I’ve done this below and the search widget pops up at the top of the code. I’ve entered part of an object name here, prod, and you can see this shows 6 matches.

    The first one is highlighted in a pale yellow color in the code.

    2024-10_0004

    If I click the down (or up) arrows in the search widget, the code jumps around, as it would in a browser. You can see below I’ve jumped down to the 4th occurrence, with the 2nd and 3rd highlighted in an orange(ish) color, while the 4th also has the yellow background bar.

    2024-10_0005

    Many of us would perform work on this code in an IDE (SSMS, ADS, etc.), but while managing a project or perhaps evaluating something else, we might want to quickly find something in code in FWD. Perhaps reviewing a change I’m about to commit. USing CTRL+F might be a handy feature.

    I do wish the search was more comprehensive at the top, and could dig through all the files in the project, but at least I can search within a file here. Having a good naming convention for migrations also helps me to find the high level purpose for a migration in the list.

    Flyway Enterprise

    Try Flyway Enterprise out today. If you haven’t worked with Flyway Desktop, download it today. There is a free version that organizes migrations and paid versions with many more features.

    If you use Flyway Community, download Flyway Desktop and get a GUI for your migration scripts.

    Video Walkthrough

    I made a quick video showing this as well. You can watch it below, or check out all the Flyway videos I’ve added: