Author: way0utwest

  • The Value of Doing Something

    I live on a working horse ranch. My wife boards, trains, and trims horses and has employees. Occasionally I have to help out with chores, or more often, fixing things. I was talking with a coworker recently and showing some pictures. He was asking why I do things like tap a bolt instead of hiring someone to do it.

    I caught this excerpt from a book on cooking, which got me thinking. I don’t love the flow here, as it wanders between cooking, economics, politics, social justice, and more. However, the core ideas of specialization and taking on a task was what I got out of the piece.

    I work for a software company, and certainly, I make much more doing that than I save by cooking a meal or fixing a bolt. I could hire someone at much less than my hourly rate to do the work. Except, I don’t get paid more for working more. Maybe if I do more sales and get a quota, but for now an extra hour of work hasn’t helped me.

    Then there’s the satisfaction of getting something done. I talk and write and move bits around all day; nothing that has a tangible result. It can be satisfying but in a very different way than cooking or physically finishing a task. I actually like getting my hands dirty and seeing the results of my work. Seeing a new fence go up, a tree come down, or a repaired bolt brings about pride. I feel good when my family appreciates a tasty recipe and everyone cleans their plates. It’s a nice challenge.

    At the same time, routine maintenance, like changing oil, sometimes feels like doing an expense report. Needs to be done, it helps me, but there’s nothing very exciting about it.

    In the era of specialization, or even the era of automation and AI tools, it might seem that we don’t need to learn or work on anything outside of our area of expertise. I think it’s important to practice, learn, and use a variety of different skills. Even if I don’t need to write PoSh often, it is helpful to sometimes tackle work that needs doing. Each bit of new knowledge brings new understanding and appreciation for the work others do.

    It also helps me gain confidence in my ability to learn and use new technologies should the requirement arise. This has also served me in past jobs where I can step in and help others or even tackle a job when they aren’t available. This is something that I find far too many people struggling with. Either because of a lack of confidence or not having enough general skills that help them troubleshoot, build, or even support the vastly changing environments in which we work.

    Doing something old, new, challenging, or easy is good for all of us. Try something new, while you also appreciate and use the skills you have. Believe in your ability to learn and prove it to yourself on a regular basis.

    Steve Jones

    Listen to the podcast at Libsyn, Stitcher, Spotify, or iTunes.

  • Assigning a Default Schema to a New User–#SQLNewBlogger

    I had to test something for a customer, and as a part of this there as a need to have a different default schema for a user. Since this isn’t something that I (or many people) do often, I wanted to make a note about how to do this.

    Another post for me that is simple and hopefully serves as an example for people trying to get blogging as #SQLNewBloggers.

    The Scenario

    A user in a database needed to access certain objects, which were going to be located in a separate schema. There was a possibility that there would be objects in the new schema and in the dbo schema with the same name, so the concern was with developers writing code that might access the wrong object.

    The Solution

    When you add a user, this is a simple parameter as part of the CREATE USER DDL. In this case, you use the DEFAULT_SCHEMA parameter. I didn’t look this up at SQL Prompt hinted me to the WITH and the parameter.

    In my case, we wanted to add a new user, which we will call APIUser and assign them to the WebAPI schema. We use this code:

    CREATE USER APIUser FOR LOGIN APIUser WITH DEFAULT_SCHEMA=WebAPI
    GO

    Note a couple things. First, the schema name isn’t quoted. It’s treated as an identifier. Second, the WITH is used to add this parameter to the statement. Once we do this, if they user does not include a schema in an object reference, like the one below, they will still get data from the object in the WebAPI schema.

    SELECT * FROM location
    

    SQL New Blogger

    This was a minor part of something else I was doing. In this case, setting up a different scenario, but I captured this slice of code, edited the names slightly, and then pasted them in here.

    Outside of the work I was doing, the sketch of these notes took about 2 minutes, and then the entire post was < 10 minutes.

    You can do this.

  • T-SQL Tuesday #164: Code that makes you feel

    tsqltuesdayThe invitation this month is from Erik Darling, and it’s a neat one. I like this thought, asking us to find code that impressed us or made us feel something. I tend to look at this as positive, but it could be negative.

    In any case, I was on vacation from 1 Jul to 9 Jul, out of touch with the world and unwired. So I’m doing this as a quick post by the seat of my pants. I might have to come back and make a second post in the future.

    Changing the way I think about T-SQL

    I’m a decent T-SQL developer. Not amazing, or great even, but I am effective. I’ve learned a lot over the years and I’ve been able to get things done for my employers. I often look at other’s code and I try to improve how I view problem solving. I’ve learned a lot from Itzik and others over the years, though I have to admit that many of us solutions go over my head. I’m just not in those spaces where I need complex coded solutions very often.

    That being said, years ago I got an article from Jeff Moden on the tally table. I hadn’t used this, and was fascinated. I know Itzik had written about numbers tables early on, but it hadn’t caught my attention. However, in a follow-up, Jeff wrote about a splitter function, which would use the tally table to split strings efficiently. This is the function (credit to Jeff in his article):

    CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[DelimitedSplit8K] --===== Define I/O parameters (@pString VARCHAR(8000), @pDelimiter CHAR(1)) --WARNING!!! DO NOT USE MAX DATA-TYPES HERE! IT WILL KILL PERFORMANCE! RETURNS TABLE WITH SCHEMABINDING AS RETURN --===== "Inline" CTE Driven "Tally Table" produces values from 1 up to 10,000... -- enough to cover VARCHAR(8000) WITH E1(N) AS ( SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 ), --10E+1 or 10 rows E2(N) AS (SELECT 1 FROM E1 a, E1 b), --10E+2 or 100 rows E4(N) AS (SELECT 1 FROM E2 a, E2 b), --10E+4 or 10,000 rows max cteTally(N) AS (--==== This provides the "base" CTE and limits the number of rows right up front -- for both a performance gain and prevention of accidental "overruns" SELECT TOP (ISNULL(DATALENGTH(@pString),0)) ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) FROM E4 ), cteStart(N1) AS (--==== This returns N+1 (starting position of each "element" just once for each delimiter) SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT t.N+1 FROM cteTally t WHERE SUBSTRING(@pString,t.N,1) = @pDelimiter ), cteLen(N1,L1) AS(--==== Return start and length (for use in substring) SELECT s.N1, ISNULL(NULLIF(CHARINDEX(@pDelimiter,@pString,s.N1),0)-s.N1,8000) FROM cteStart s ) --===== Do the actual split. The ISNULL/NULLIF combo handles the length for the final element when no delimiter is found. SELECT ItemNumber = ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY l.N1), Item = SUBSTRING(@pString, l.N1, l.L1) FROM cteLen l ;

    Now, note this is not the original code, but updated and improved code. I love that Jeff has maintained this.

    What I found great is how Jeff approached the problem. This is limited to 8k strings, but that’s for performance reasons. One could easily enhance this to be larger if needed. I also like the tally table is quickly generated from simple code that gives us 10,000 numbers.

    I also found the simplicity of the substring and the charindex to be something I think I not only understand, but could have written.

    Could have. Certainly didn’t and might not have. This is great code that’s been helpful to me over the years in places where I wanted to break up code. I’ve used this in a number of demos for clients and I’ve referred people to this over the years as well.

  • Bare Metal

    At the first job I had as a DBA, I had to build a new server. This was in the days of SQL Server 4.2, and I was combination DBA, sysadmin, and general help desk at a small company. With a software developer consultant, we ran some tests on various machines and then ordered a collection of parts from Compaq. Back in this time, they would only customer parts of the server. We unpacked our boxes with the server, extra drive bay, various SCSI drives, and extra RAM. We assembled and tested the machine and eventually put it into production.

    In the years since then, I got out of the hardware business and left that to others. For awhile I worked in organizations with IT staff dedicated to building machines, but at some point we stopped doing that. The growth of VMWare and other hypervisors changed the paradigm for most organizations. For more than a decade, all the servers I’ve connected to are virtual machines running on hardware that my employer or a cloud provider owns and manages as a node in a cluster.

    Early on there were concerns about the overhead of using hypervisors and virtual machines. When many early workloads moved to VMs, lots of organizations left database servers on bare metal to squeeze every bit of performance out of the system that was possible. Over the years, improvements in hypervisors as well as the software used to connect storage and networks together seem to have rendered those conversations obsolete.

    Or have they?

    Today I’m wondering if any of you still have servers on bare metal. Are there systems that you continue to install the OS and database server software directly on the hardware? Or are there systems where you still ensure that there is only one VM, the database server VM, on a hardware node?

    The cloud has changed a lot of these conversations, since everything is a VM. Even many local data centers will rent you a VM, something that wasn’t possible when we first moved SQL Server Central out of a friend’s basement into a co-location facility. Back then we owned our servers and I installed them in data center racks. I would like to think we’d have moved our site to the cloud in some way over time, though maybe not. Maybe I’d still be managing a couple servers in a room in Denver.

    Are any of your organizations still running legacy systems in the same way you would have in 1999? Let us know today.

    Steve Jones

    Listen to the podcast at Libsyn, Stitcher, Spotify, or iTunes.