Tag: software development

  • The Challenges of Being Safe

    This editorial was originally published on Mar 19, 2009. It is being re-run today as Steve is away at DevConnections.

    One thing we recommend is to make sure that production data is always kept safe, which means that you keep control of where it lives and how it’s used. I saw a post recently where someone needed to send data to a business partner and wanted to obfuscate it.  I think that is a great thing to do and was glad to see someone asking for advice.  Sending data to business partners is required, but you want to be sure that you are not necessarily giving away too much information, especially identity, privacy, or financial information that you shouldn’t.

    However what about your test and development environments? I’ve seen people obfuscate data here, but not always. In fact, not usually. This is despite the fact that you might turn over developers often, expose that data to testers, or other people that might not normally have access, and the fact that these environments almost never have auditing enabled.

    We need to mimic production environments and data, but there are quite a few challenges with doing this in a safe and secure manner. Just having scripts to obfuscate data is a challenge in and of itself. I’d love to see a tool built that would do this automatically, though I wonder how many companies would actually buy it. I’m not sure there’s a great market for tools here until insurance companies start require it for your “data loss insurance.”

    But building those scripts is both hard and time consuming. How do you decide what to obfuscate? What values do you use? How do handle PK/FKs to ensure that things match up correctly if you’ve used personal information, like a SSN, as a key field?

    Beyond that, there’s much more. What about ensuring that data matches up correctly? Can you really determine if there is an issue with some calculation or relationship if you have random data. After all people many times will have favorite accounts that they know well and understand what the data should look like. A developer may expect certain order details or address information, and use that as a benchmark when developing new code. If the data is random every time his environment is refreshed, does that slow his productivity? How do you test things like URLs and emails if data is randomized?

    And what about when you alter your schemas? How much work is there to update your scripts?

    And what about mistakes? How often has someone pointed development code at a production server? What happens if they accidently run an obfuscation script against production? If you’ve scrambled data around, would you catch it quickly enough to restore before too many transactions were sent through?

    Using some type of data obfuscation or randomization is a great way to help ensure that your production data is kept safe, but it definitely makes for a much more complex environment, and likely, more headaches for DBAs and developers.

    Steve Jones


    The Voice of the DBA Podcasts

    Everyday Jones

    The podcast feeds are now available atsqlservercentral.mevio.comto get better bandwidth and maybe a little more exposure :). Comments are definitely appreciated and wanted, and you can get feeds from there.

    Overall RSS Feed:  or now on iTunes! 

    Today’s podcast features music by Everyday Jones. No relation, but I stumbled on to them and really like the music. Support this great duo at www.everydayjones.com.

    I really appreciate and value feedback on the podcasts. Let us know what you like, don’t like, or even send in ideas for the show. If you’d like to comment, post something here. The boss will be sure to read it.

  • Secure Programming

    This editorial was originally published on Mar 19, 2009. It is being re-run today as Steve is away at DevConnections.

    Writing secure software is hard. The way most people learn software, from simple examples that slowly build our knowledge, doesn’t encourage complicated solutions that provide robust error checking, error handling, and secure practices. Most examples that I’ve seen in the world include “dumbed down” code that is easy to understand and explain in a class or seminar.

    And that’s the code that often gets used by developers.

    They go with the simple example, and enhance it, not really concerning themselves with best practices, or even great practices. In fact, if you search for sample code on the Internet, read articles on various sites about programming, or buy a book from an “expert” it seems that more often than not, the code isn’t well written from a security perspective. Yet that’s the code, and the mentoring, that many developers get.

    And for a DBA, that code is a nightmare.

    Too often the code samples and practices that are taught to people include dynamic SQL built in the application with little to no thought about SQL Injection. And it doesn’t matter if the application is at fault. As the DBA it’s often your phone that rings, and you that end up explaining to your boss why all the products on the site cost $1, or why every customer’s name is “0wned by S&p#rG##k.”

    The NSA, along with a number of other companies, is trying to do something about poor programming practices. They have release a list of the 25 most dangerous programming mistakes. What’s interesting is that some government agencies, and hopefully companies soon, are using this list as a litmus test for vendors. Software companies are being asked to guarantee that their software contains none of these mistakes.

    I think it’s a great idea, and I wonder how well it will be enforced. Microsoft and Oracle, among quite a few other software vendors, provided input into the list. You’d hope that their software would be fixed, or at least all new software would comply with the recommendations and not contain any of these mistakes.

    Steve Jones


    The Voice of the DBA Podcasts

    Everyday Jones

    The podcast feeds are available atsqlservercentral.mevio.com. Comments are definitely appreciated and wanted, and you can get feeds from there.

    You can also follow Steve Jones on Twitter:

    Overall RSS Feed:  or now on iTunes! 

    Today’s podcast features music by Everyday Jones. No relation, but I stumbled on to them and really like the music. Support this great duo at www.everydayjones.com.

  • Best Practices for Database Deployment

    The easiest part of any deployment is running the deployment script on production. But what have you done to prepare that script for production? Was the script tested? Is the script tightly coupled with the application code?

    The difference between a successful deployment and a failed or problematic deployment is all the preparation work you’ve done to ensure that you’re deploying the right script, the right way to your production environment. This session will explore best practices that you can implement to ensure that your deployments are as successful as they can be.

    Slides:

  • Automated Build and Test

    Continuous Integration (CI) is a well known process in the software development world, but it’s not often implemented with databases. This is despite the fact that database code could benefit from the practice of checking the changes on a regular basis for potential issues. This talk will show how to implement continuous integration for databases and include more realistic testing of the code for potential issues.

    We will set up CI for a SQL Server database project, using the following tools:

    • Team City (CI Server)
    • Subversion (VCS)
    • SQL Automation Pack (database -> CI integration)
    • tSQLt  testing framework
    • SQL Data Generator

    Slides