Tag: syndicated

  • DevOps Devour Hour Slides

    Here are the slides from my talk today at the Redgate NYC Devour Hour: Architecting Zero Downtime Deployments.pptx

    The Repo is here: https://github.com/way0utwest/ZeroDowntime

    An interesting question on feature toggles: Would you use Extended Properties for a feature toggle flag?

    My answer:

    I wouldn’t. I find Extended Propeties (and triggers) to be hidden inside databases and I don’t like hidden things. They fall through the cracks, it’s hard to remember they exist, and more. Plus Extended properties aren’t easily programmed.

    I would love

    alter table add (or update) extended property

    and a way to query these

    select * from table.properties

    Instead we have a messed up sp_add/update property with a very, very unintuitive set of parameters.

  • Advice I Like: Take Two Trips

    If you have any doubt about being able to carry a load in one trip, do yourself a huge favor and make two trips – from Excellent Advice for Living

    As I get older, this tends to resonate more with me. Certainly I’ve learned not to strain my body because pushing past a limit is painful for days or weeks (or months).

    However, this “carry a load” can make sense in more than just the physical carrying-a-bunch-of-stuff situation. This is a similar situation is you’re trying to accomplish too much in a day, or a sprint, or committing to too many things in a short period of time. It also applies when you try to communicate too many things at once.

    I live my life in a busy fashion, usually having too much stuff on my list of things to do. I’m perpetually behind on fixing things on the ranch, taking care of the house, cooking meals, getting to the gym, improving my coaching skills, etc. I rarely take a day off from not doing something to make my (or someone else’s) life better. That’s a little of how I am built.

    However, I have learned to pace myself a bit more and be cautious about how many things I tackle in a day. I have projects that I might try to rush through in a day and perhaps not get them done the way I expected. Instead, I might break them up across two days. Or two sessions.

    I’ve also learned to communicate one thing and not try to get people to think about three things at once. I try to get myself, and others, to focus on the one important thing that we’re talking about at that moment.

    And, of course, I try not to carry too much at once. I find myself using carts or UTVs rather than piling everything into my arms.

    I’ve been posting New Words on Fridays from a book I was reading, however, a friend thought they were a little depressing. They should be as they are obscure sorrows. I like them because they make me think.

    To counter-balance those, I’m adding in thoughts on advice, mostly from Kevin Kelley’s book. You can read all these posts under the advice tag.

  • Checking Myself with GenAI

    I had a suggestion from somone on a place where AI helps them and I decided to try it. The person had an AI summarize their work and if the result wasn’t the intention of the author, then they know know their writing wasn’t clear.

    This post looks at how that worked for me.

    This is part of a series of experiments with AI systems.

    Checking an Editorial

    I wrote an editorial on database Devops that was published recently. I decided to have a few AIs summarize this and see if the result was what I intended. First up, Claude, with a simple prompt: summarize this text (insert here). See the top of the prompt here:

    2025-05_line0025

    The result is shown below and seems to be an accurate summary of the text. This is basically what I was trying to say in the piece. Of course, this isn’t much shorter than the text, but this gives me confidence here in the ability to recognize what I’ve written.

    2025-05_line0027

    In Perplexity, I got this result. This result is similar, but doesn’t mention the author. Instead, this is a summary of the text, not trying to give a voice to the author, which is interesting. Very close to the text above, but this seems slightly drier, taking the text as fact rather than opinion.

    2025-05_line0026

    Perplexity also had some related items at the bottom, which injected a prompt back into the LLM for more info.

    2025-05_line0029

    Last, Copilot. I have a dedicated key on my laptop for this and I pressed it and entered my prompt in the app. This result is shorter and to the point. There are some additional links to click that the bottom.

    2025-05_line0028

    Clicking on one of the items at the bottom injects the text and gets a new result.

    2025-05_line0030

    I tried this with a couple other piece of work, some of which aren’t published. In each case (3 attempts), the summary made sense. I don’t know if that means I am writing anything clearly, but it does help me get a sense of what I’ve written.

  • Speaking at the NYC Lunch and Learn DevOps Devour Hour

    This Friday is the NYC DevOps Devour hour, which is actually 3 hours. Plus a happy hour.

    I’ll be there with Kendra Little and Erik Darling talking about DevOps stuff. You can register now and join me in Manhattan from 12:00-3:00p at the 3rd Avenue Industrious office.

    We’ll be talking performance problems, cloud migration, and deployment architecture. Come join us if you can.