Tag: encryption

  • Decryption and CASTing

    In my last encryption post I showed how to encrypt and decrypt data with a symmetric key. However there was a piece of the explanation I left out. If you look at that post, suppose that you ran this query after you’d encrypted the data:

    -- decrypt the data
    select 
      id
    ,firstname
    ,lastname
    ,title
    ,Salary = DecryptByKey(EnryptedSalary)
    ,EnryptedSalary
     from Employees
    go

    The results wouldn’t be what you’d expect:

    decrypt

    The binary data is returned, which isn’t rendered correctly. The salary column is the decryption, and the EncryptedSalary is the encrypted data. Note they are different.

    This stumped me for awhile when I was playing with encryption and I checked the dercryptbykey page thoroughly before I realized that the return type was varbinary and needed to be CAST.

    If I cast this back to nvarchar, I get the data:

    select 
      id
    , title
    , Salary = cast(DecryptByKey(EnryptedSalary) as nvarchar) 
    , EnryptedSalary
     from Employees

    decrypt2

    In my example, I CAST to nvarchar, and then to numeric, mostly for clean coding. This is numeric data. Can I cast directly?

    select 
      id
    , title
    , Salary = cast(DecryptByKey(EnryptedSalary) as numeric(10,4))
    , EnryptedSalary
     from Employees
    go

    No. I get an error.

    Msg 8115, Level 16, State 6, Line 1

    Arithmetic overflow error converting varbinary to data type numeric.

    This isn’t a valid CAST, so I need to double up the CASTs as shown in the original post.

  • Using a Symmetric Key

    In my Encryption Primer talk, I do demo on symmetric key use, and wanted to document it here. Encryption is a serious subject, and please do your research and education, as well as testing, before you implement it.

    This post will look at some simple encryption and decryption using symmetric keys. I showed how to create a symmetric key before, so I won’t talk about that here, but I’ll just show the code.

    Let’s set up a test table. In this case, I’m showing salary in a table, which isn’t something you want to do, but you might have this in an existing application: data you need to encrypt, but it’s stored unencrypted.

    -- create a table 
    create table Employees ( 
     id int identity(1,1)
     , firstname varchar(200)
     ,lastname varchar(200)
     ,title varchar(200)
     ,salary numeric(10, 4) );
    go
    insert Employees 
    values
      ('Steve','Jones','CEO', 5000)
     , ('Delaney','Jones','Manure Shoveler', 10)
     , ('Kendall','Jones','Window Washer', 5)
    ;
    go 

    Here I have three employees and salaries. Now I want to encrypt the salary. However I cannot just encrypt this value. Encryption creates a binary representation of the data, and that won’t fit in a varchar field. So I need to add a column.

    alter table Employees 
     add EnryptedSalary varbinary(max);
    go 

    Now I have a placeholder, so let’s create a key and then update the new binary column with the encrypted value.

    -- create a symmetric key
    create symmetric key MySalaryProtector
     WITH ALGORITHM=AES_256
     , IDENTITY_VALUE = 'Salary Protection Key'
     , Key_SOURCE = N'Keep this phrase a secr#t' 
     ENCRYPTION BY PASSWORD = 'Us#aStrongP2ssword'
    ;
    go 
    -- open the key 
    open symmetric key MySalaryProtector
     decryption by password='Us#aStrongP2ssword'
    ;
    
    -- encrypt the data 
    update Employees 
     set EnryptedSalary = ENCRYPTBYKEY(key_guid('MySalaryProtector'),cast(salary as nvarchar))
    ; 
    go 
    -- remove the old data 
    update employees
     set salary = 0
    ; 
    go 

    Note that I open the key, which is needed. I can close it at the end, or it will close when my session ends. I don’t close it here as I usually run this demo in the course of one session.

    The encryption takes place with the ENCRYPTBYKEY function, which requires the GUID of the key. Why the GUID and not the name I don’t know, but it seems like a PIA, halfway implementation. In any case, the KEY_GUID function is used as the first parameter.

    The number needs to be cast as a character, so I do that first, and then it’s the next parameter in the function. If I look at the data, it looks like this:

    select id , firstname , lastname , title , salary , EnryptedSalary
     from Employees; go 

    encryptsymm

    If you use the same identity_value and key_source, you should get the same encryption.

    To decrypt it, I do this:

    -- decrypt the data, with the casting  select id  , firstname  , lastname  , title  , Salary = cast(cast(DecryptByKey(EnryptedSalary) as nvarchar) as numeric(10,4))  , EnryptedSalary  from Employees go 

    The encrypted value has a header that tells it what key is used, so as long as it’s open, this works.

  • We Need to Learn Encryption

    encryption
    We need better encryption and better tools for the future.

    More than learning encryption, we need to demand better encryption tools inside SQL Server. After reading about the issues from the STUXNET worm, it makes me worried that we will see more disruptive attacks, not just from hackers and criminals, but from the virtual vandals and bored teenagers that have more time than morals or sense. The issues from the STUXNET worm spread far beyond any territorial or national issues, and run into all sorts of industrial control systems that may receive more attention from hackers in the future. With some of the brightest hackers in the US and Israeli governments providing a template for compromising those system, I’m sure there will be no shortage of future attacks.

    That doesn’t necessarily mean there are going to be more and more database attacks in the near future, but I’m sure there is research going on into new ways to attack database or applications, either from governments, criminals, or even graduate students. At some point there will be new attacks that come out, and these vulnerabilities may result in zero-day, or even forever-day vulnerabilities.

    We can’t change the way SQL Server, or other vendor technologies, work at a base level, but we can reduce the amount of damage that’s done by not being the easy prey for attackers. In my mind, that means we should be securing our data as best we can, including encrypting communications and limiting access rights, as well as encrypting the actual data we store.

    I’m hoping that Microsoft makes PKI much easier when they release the updated Certificate Services in Windows 2012, and that we also find better private solutions for individuals that allows us to better secure our systems and make it difficult for the casual attacker to compromise our systems. I don’t know if we’ll see viable products and solutions soon, but as we distribute our systems, data, and backups to wider and wider systems, including tablets and mobile devices, we need better security more than ever.

    Steve Jones


    The Voice of the DBA Podcasts

    We publish three versions of the podcast each day for you to enjoy.

  • SQL Saturday #132 Files

    Uploaded here if you need them. These are the PPT deck and the code.

    UnstructuredData.zip

    EncryptionPrimer.zip