Seagull Management

Last year, I read Surrender, a book by U2 lead singer, Bono. Bill Gates listed this as one of the top books to read at one point, so I picked it up and dove in. I have enjoyed U2s music since I was in high school, and was interested to hear what made Bill Gates recommend his book. The book is partially a journey of U2, but mostly a look at how Bono’s view of the world and life has changed over time.

Bono grew beyond music in his life to become an activist and try to shape the world into a better place. Whether you agree with his efforts or focus or not, it’s admirable that he has tried to be more than a rich and famous singer. He’s had to build more skills around how to communicate with others, convince them to take a course of action, and educate himself about the world. In trying to build these skills, he’s founded or worked in organizations around his time with U2.

As a part of that, he had a great quote about leaders who are busy elsewhere but try to be involved in different parts of the business. He called this seagull management, and it was something he tried to avoid doing as he only comes into the office periodically.

Seagull management is where you fly into the office, shit over what everyone is doing, and fly off again. I wonder how many people in management do this but think that they are motivating, helping, or improving their workers’ efforts. Trying to bring their view, experience, knowledge, etc. to others, but invariably doing so in a way that doesn’t resonate with workers. Perhaps it’s not even helpful if management hasn’t taken the time to understand why people are working in a certain way.

I also see this with technical leads or senior engineers who come into a situation, often with strong opinions. They might express how they would have coded or architected something completely differently. Perhaps even informing existing staff that they are doing something wrong. Whether good intentioned or not, seagull management doesn’t help improve any situation.

We make bad decisions, we may build something without considering all the information, or perhaps the situation changes. We all find ourselves in situations where the technology doesn’t seem to be well matched to the environment. We might wish things were different. However, no matter how we arrive at our present situation, we are there. Extracting ourselves from any legacy environment takes time and has to be a journey that is undertaken with support from both technical staff and management.

Most of us want to build great systems that work well for our clients and are admired by others. We rarely find ourselves in a place where we have the time and resources to do that. We can refactor, evolve, and grow our systems to be better, but it does take time. We need a goal, direction, support, and understanding that change is a journey, not something that a manager can fix on their rare visits to our environment.

Steve Jones

Listen to the podcast at Libsyn, Spotify, or iTunes.

About way0utwest

Editor, SQLServerCentral
This entry was posted in Editorial and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Seagull Management

  1. Proper communication is key be it meaning to say %100 of what you are thinking and not around %80 b/c you assume the other will just know the remaining %20 or if it means not making assumptions about workers until you’ve had the chance to see for yourself. This seagull mgt is a great way for control freaks and bully types in exec/mgt positions to keep people below them from ever challenging them. Back in my retail days, when I was young and in a job that I didn’t care if I got fired, I stood up and told our stores District Mgr he was wrong. It’s been soo long I forget the specifics but IO remember the event because all the employees that needed the jobs they had were shocked. I got pulled aside after and told by teh store mgr to never do anything like that again and when I reminded her that I was right and she knew he was wrong and I was correct her reply was that it doesn’t matter since he’s the district supervisor. I quit shortly after to work at a more employee friendly outfit but before I left I did note that after the DM had been gone for a few days the Mgr & Ast Mgr un-did the merchandising changes the DM had made b/c they both knew the guy was wrong but were afraid to tell him.

    Some have very dominating personalities and not necessarily because they are bullies it’s just how they are sop you do have to be capable of telling the difference. 

    Like

    • way0utwest says:

      Communication is what they hear, not what you say. I think far too many people, management and elsewhere, forget that. I think about that a lot as I coach, and am I getting a message through to players.

      Lots of bullies out there think they’re managing well because they’re tough but they aren’t necessarily getting the best out of staff. Sometimes I deserve to be yelled at. Sometimes I need guidance, sometimes I need explanation, sometimes I need inspiration. Good leaders adapt to different times and situations.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.