Liability for AI Errors

Posted on June 13, 2026 by way0utwest

This week there was an article that speculated that doctors in the UK could be liable for errors made by AI tools unless rules are changed. The argument is that AI tools should be treated as products, which isn’t necessarily the case right now. Right now doctors may face all the liability instead of AI tool makers having some responsibility. From my reading, this doesn’t appear to say that doctors aren’t still accountable for mistakes, but they aren’t wholly accountable. The Medical Protection Society wants the technology vendors to bear some responsibility.

I have to admit I’m torn here. If doctors are using tools, they should be sure the tools work well and they agree with the recommendations or results. However, I think AI changes things somewhat. If I read a medical device, say one that analyzes blood, I expect that the results are deterministic and accurate. If they aren’t, how could I, as a doctor, know that. The companies the built (or maintain) the device would be culpable for errors.

Using AI assistance, however, is a little different. This is a non-deterministic interpretation of data. In the same situation, if an AI were to interpret blood results and summarize them, perhaps failing to point out a deviation of a value and this impacted patient care, is the AI responsible? The doctor for not realizing there is an issue? Joint responsibility?

I think it’s unclear. I’m not 100% sure how I feel here, and I lean towards both being liable. If someone is training an AI model to help with medicine, then they ought to bear (and feel) accountable for results.

This seems different than software engineering to me. In medicine we have humans overloaded and AI is supposed to help, but has to be responsible. I don’t think the stakes are as high in producing software. It’s an arbitrary decision to say we need to get xx work done with yy resources. AI can help, perhaps amplify the abilities of people to produce code, but the people still have to verify the AI results. Any time pressure is a decision we make, not one brought on by medical issues.

Perhaps this seems hypocritical, and I will admin I’m not 100% sure how I feel, but I’m more concerned with AI technology bearing responsibility in healthcare than software. Do you feel the same way? Or perhaps in either case the AI is just a tool? Let me know what you think,

Steve Jones

Posted in Editorial | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Republish: The Degradation of the Turing Test

Posted on June 12, 2026 by way0utwest

I’m on my way back from Frankfurt and PASS Europe. It’s been a long week, a quick Tue-Fri trip to the EU and my brain is a bit fried. Lots of chats and conversations, and more than a few time zones.

You re-read The Degradation of the Turing Test while I try to sleep on a plane.

Posted in Editorial | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Book of Redgate: Taking Breaks

Posted on June 12, 2026 by way0utwest

We work hard at Redgate, though with a good work-life balance. One interesting observation for me (as an American) is how well most of the company in the UK works normal hours and rarely works outside of those.

However, sometimes we do find people, especially engineers, heads down and very focused. With our engineers in the office a day or two a week, they might end up coding in a group and trying to solve a challenging issue.

We used to have engineers working more than 8 hours regularly, often late, when they were in the office. I came across this page in the Book of Redgate.

2026-04_0229

The text below is: Working too hard? Why not relax with a gentle game of ping-pong.

Our offices have always had some game tables. I don’t think we have ping pong in the new office, but we have a pool table near the coffee machines and I’ll see people taking a few minutes to play a game at different times. We also (I think) still have a foosball table.

We have a piano upstairs, and some guitars in the foyer. I usually take a few minutes between meetings and strum some songs. Here’s the view I have most days when I’m in the office, a few minutes at a time.

20260121_094507

We’re not afraid of resistant to working hard. We just try to take breaks and find balance.

I have a copy of the Book of Redgate from 2010. This was a book we produced internally about the company after 10 years in existence. At that time, I’d been there for about 3 years, and it was interesting to learn a some things about the company. This series of posts looks back at the Book of Redgate 15 years later.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Funny Money: #SQLNewBlogger

Posted on June 10, 2026 by way0utwest

While wandering around the documentation looking for some Question of the Day topics, I learned something new about the money data type. This post discusses what I learned.

Another post for me that is simple and hopefully serves as an example for people trying to get blogging as #SQLNewBloggers.

The Money Type

Did you know that you can add a currency symbol to the money data type for assignment? I didn’t. This isn’t in the documentation, but it’s something I need to submit as a PR.

In any case, I can assign money like this:

DECLARE @YenAmount MONEY;
SET @YenAmount = ¥1500; 

SELECT @YenAmount AS RawValue;

Note that this isn’t really assigning Yen values. It’s just a number, but since the money type supports certain literals, this works. If I select the amount, I get just a number.

2026-05_0087

If I change the symbol, it still works because SQL Server doesn’t really interpret the amount and symbol or the variable name. That being said, this is bad code.

2026-05_0089

The money and smallmoney data type page lists the symbols you can use, but none of them are stored. Where this page fails is that it doesn’t help you get the values back out as the currency.

Format helps here. I can use this with some culture to determine what I want to get out. For example, I get Yen with this: 

 FORMAT(@YenAmount, 'c', 'ja-JP')

You can see the results here:

2026-05_0090

I can also get Pounds.

2026-05_0091

SQL New Blogger

This post took me about 5 minutes to assemble as I’d already had the code, but it’s an example of a quick thing based on other work I was doing.

You can showcase this and help others see that you are learning and growing.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment