The AI View From Above

It likely isn’t a surprise to many of you that executives like AI. A survey shows that 74% of executives surveyed have greater confidence in AI-generated insights than advice from colleagues or friends. At the board level, even more (85%) favor AI-driven advice.

That’s amazing to me, and while I might think this is a bit too much trust being placed in these GenAI LLMs, perhaps it’s also partially because they work with too many people who aren’t great at their jobs. Plenty of people skim through data or focus on certain things and might miss the details. While an AI can read and summarize a lot, it might not have the context we expect. I tend to be a bit skeptical of AI summaries, often because they don’t necessarily weigh the different parts of an article the same way that I do. However, they can be helpful.

Even more interesting, 44% of executives say they would trust a GenAI to override their decisions based on insights, and 38% would trust AI to make decisions on their behalf. Business decisions based on data, or conclusions from a lot of inputs are different than producing working code, so I don’t know how accurate these models might be in this context. I do know that I want experienced people reviewing and judging GenAI outputs, and I would not allow an AI to override me without my input.

However, I wouldn’t just discount a GenAI recommendation. I tend to have strong opinions, but loosely held. I’ll change if there is evidence or a good argument to do so. It’s possible a GenAI might see things I miss and produce an insight that gets me to change a decision.

What’s a bit scary about the stats from this survey is that many executives see a skills gap in their staff, and their trust in GenAI might lead them to replace or augment existing staff with more GenAI tools. They might expect hiring can be delayed or slowed (or eliminated) with GenAI filling gaps. This might be especially true as many tech companies talk about how GenAI tools are making them more efficient.

That means that tech professionals should consider a few things. First, learn to work with GenAI tools and use them to prove your value to an organization. This includes learning when not to use them. Second, continue to improve your skills to ensure you can judge Gen AI results and emphasize that you are still the expert. Lastly, as the technology improves, consider adding some skills in how to train an AI to be a better assistant for you. The more efficient you are, especially with a GenAI helper, the more likely you are to impress executives and managers that are choosing which staff to keep.

Steve Jones

Listen to the podcast at Libsyn, Spotify, or iTunes.

Note, podcasts are only available for a limited time online.

Posted in Editorial | Tagged | 4 Comments

The Book of Redgate: Do Your Best Work

One of our mission statements in the Book of Redgate says: attempt to do the best work of your life.

I’d like to think that at most points in time, people are trying to go good work. There are always times when you are distracted, ill, new child, etc. However, doing the best work of your life? Do you think you are always doing the “best work” at a new place? Or being the best version of yourself at this current position?

I think I am, and this is a good reminder to strive for being the best you can be at that point in time.

The text alongside this value is: We’d like you to achieve your own greatness and to be all that you can be. We’ll try hard to allow that to happen and we’d like you to try hard too.

That’s comforting and inspiring. I do think we try to allow people to grow and achieve things. It’s a nice environment.

I have a copy of the Book of Redgate from 2010. This was a book we produced internally about the company after 10 years in existence. At that time, I’d been there for about 3 years, and it was interesting to learn a some things about the company. This series of posts looks back at the Book of Redgate 15 years later.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Book of Redgate: Do Your Best Work

Are Data Breaches Inevitable?

I read a piece recently that got me thinking that data breaches might be inevitable. Disclosure: This was written by Redgate, for whom I work, titled “Data breaches May Be Inevitable—Compliance Failures Don’t Have to Be“. It’s based on our research with the State of Database Landscape survey as well as feedback and conversations with customers.

The thing that caught my eye was the first part: data breaches may be inevitable. Do you think that’s true? Are we doomed to lose data in our organizations, not as a possibility, but something that will happen at some unknown time in the future? Those of you who have suffered breaches might agree with this, but for those of you who haven’t had to deal with that situation, are you resigned to it happening at some point?

I’ve gone through phases in my career. In a few jobs I worried about this. When we started SQL Server Central, we were very careful and cautious, trying to be sure we wouldn’t be caught losing email addresses of the community members. We never had an issue, and I’m proud of that. These days at Redgate, I worry a bit more, mostly because we’re growing and it only takes one person to click on a phishing email to cause problems. Fortunately our IT group is on the ball and even conducts plenty of “mystery shopper” email campaigns to test our awareness with follow-ups to help ensure people are aware and careful with how we handle data.

The criminals always have an advantage in that they are focused and only have to take advantage of one mistake to win. We have to constantly be vigilant, across all our staffers and systems. Simple mistakes, or worse, typos in complex configuration files could result in a data breach. One of the places this can happen is in test/dev environments where more people the make changes. If we have sensitive data in those places, we’re increasing our risk.

I don’t think breaches are inevitable, mostly because companies are getting better at simple security measures and reducing the ways in which unauthorized access takes place. There’s also the fact that the world is huge and there are more and more systems all the time, which might reduce our chances of the criminals targeting us. Don’t get complacent, as automation gives criminals a tool to attack us at scale, in the same way it lets us get more done with less.

One criminal can do a lot of damage, so remember that the next time you’re annoyed by your MFA or other security measures.

Steve Jones

Listen to the podcast at Libsyn, Spotify, or iTunes.

Note, podcasts are only available for a limited time online.

Posted in Editorial | Tagged | Comments Off on Are Data Breaches Inevitable?

A DevOps Workshop Tomorrow in Atlanta

Tomorrow is the Redgate DevOps Day in Atlanta. You can still sign up, so do that if you can make it. Here’s the rough outline

  • Vision Session – w/ Advocate Steve Jones
  • Redgate Flyway hands-on Session
  • 6 ways to Elevate Database Monitoring
  • Whiteboarding Session
  • Test Data Manager Demo Session
  • Networking/Happy Hour

Lunch is provided and I’m looking forward to this. I’m traveling from Baton Rouge today to Atlanta (probably right now), coming from a customer visit.

Register and come see me in Atlanta tomorrow

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A DevOps Workshop Tomorrow in Atlanta