The Worst Data Breech

I noticed this week that Australia passed a law that requires companies to hand over user information, even if encrypted. Quite a few articles that point out this might require backdoors to be created in communication systems to comply with the law. Companies are required to provide plain text user communication if they can, or build tools to allow this if they do not have the capability. The proponents of the bill argue this is necessary for criminal prosecution.

Perhaps they are right, but if this capability is required, this means that either companies will have backdoors built into their products that allow them to decrypt things you might have expected to remain encrypted. That’s disconcerting to me, not because Apple, Google, or someone else might read my communications, but because no company has really proven they can protect all the data they store.

Can you imagine how many malicious actors might spent their efforts trying to find those backdoor encryption keys? What if there aren’t backdoor keys, but companies decide to build some sort of key logger into software that copies data before it’s encrypted. Can you imagine how problematic it might be to secure that data?

I’m also concerned because this would mean that there could be a few keys that can be used to get access to encrypted data, something like “master keys” in door locks. In this case, the loss of a key might mean problems for huge numbers of people. The other option would be lots of backdoor keys, potentially a different one for each customer/device, in which case we have a large data set that I’m sure will get leaked. At that time, how likely will it be that we’ll be able to implement new keys for large numbers of people?

I sympathize with law enforcement. In some ways, their jobs are much harder. In others, however, I think they have many more tools, and the need to weaken encryption doesn’t seem to be necessary. Many of us have a need to secure data, to protect it from unauthorized access. At a time when security is proving to be a challenge and record numbers of data breeches are occurring, do we really want tech companies to start building products with less security? I don’t.

Steve Jones


About way0utwest

Editor, SQLServerCentral
This entry was posted in Editorial and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The Worst Data Breech

  1. Kevin Lewis says:

    From the narrative I have seen thus far, they rushed this law into effect under the lie that it will prevent terrorist attacks at Christmas. No company in the world will be able to build what they are asking before the 25th December.

    I do wonder if there is a GDPR style data breach due to this new crazy George Orwell esq 1984 law whether there can be come any come back on the Australian government, it would be “fair dinkum” after all.

    Also how many other governments will try and pass this off. The UK’s GCHQ want “virtual crocodile clips” to eaves drop into WhatsApp conversations for instance.

    Encryption one way or another has been around for half a millennium. The bad guys will always move to different forms of communication if they feel that one way is compromised and leave the good guys pawned. With these type of backdoors they are just throwing out the baby with the bath water.


Comments are closed.